Nyx Book Reviews

fantasy ♥ paranormal ♥ horror ♥ science-fiction

Review: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick

Title: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
Author: Philip K. Dick
Series: Standalone
Rating: 4 Stars

193 pages
Published March 2010 by Gollancz
Bought

Goodreads | Amazon | Book Depository

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is a science-fiction classic from the 1960s that has been largely forgotten outside of the genre.

After World War Terminus, Earth is covered in radioactive dust, destroying the ecosystem. Most people have emigrated to the colony on Mars. Rick is one of those who stayed behind. He is a bounty hunter charged with killing androids that have escaped from Mars. After his superior hunter is hospitalized, it’s up to him to “retire” a few dangerous and near-human androids.

I haven’t read a lot of science-fiction, but the genre in general appeals to me in how it treats philosophical concepts. Do Androids Dream is a fantastic example of this. While the book could have easily been a action-packed novel with many fighting scenes and chasing androids across the galaxy, it’s much more concerned with ideas. Though I’m slightly hesitant to use this label, but I think the book has many elements of literary fiction. It’s incredibly layered and the easy-to-read plot keeps the book accessible.

Among other things, Do Androids Dream is concerned with identity, empathy, and ultimately, what makes us human. There is a dash of religion, but while it was inspired by Christianity to a limited extent, it’s served with a big heap of post-modernity, making it much more palatable to my agnostic tastes. There is a lot going on in this book, but I never felt overwhelmed. Mr Dick writes in a clear, though sometimes surrealistic, style. The book isn’t much concerned with futuristic tech, but some of the inventions made me chuckle.

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is a book that makes you think, something all good science-fiction does. I would love to reread this book with my academic-reader hat on, because there is still so much to discover. Would recommend it for readers who enjoyed Brave New World.

Blurb

World War Terminus had left the Earth devastated. Through its ruins, bounty hunter Rick Deckard stalked, in search of the renegade replicants who were his prey. When he wasn’t ‘retiring’ them with his laser weapon, he dreamed of owning a live animal — the ultimate status symbol in a world all but bereft of animal life.

Then Rick got his chance: the assignment to kill six Nexus-6 targets, for a huge reward. But in Deckard’s world things were never that simple, and his assignment quickly turned into a nightmare kaleidoscope of subterfuge and deceit -and the threat of death for the hunter rather than the hunted…

Other reviews you might be interested in
  • Foundation by Isaac Asimov
  • The Stepford Wives by Ira Levin
  • Cress by Marissa Meyer
  • I, Robot by Isaac Asimov
  • , , , , , , , , , ,

    • Rinn (Rinn Reads)

      I love this book so much, it’s one of my favourites. Have you seen Blade Runner? I actually much preferred the book to the film, despite its cult following.

    • Hibernators Library

      I totally tried to talk my book club into reading this for November (so I could double-dip), but they scuttled it. Apparently one of them isn’t a fan of Philip K. Dick. How is that possible?!

    • http://www.fortheloveofwords.net/ Bonnie

      I haven’t read a whole lot of sci-fi either, especially classic sci-fi. This one is definitely on my list though! Great review!

    • http://www.spajonas.com/ S. J. Pajonas

      I’m the opposite. I recently read this book and did not like it at all. I hated the fact that it left so many plot points unresolved. Why can’t androids live on Earth? They never say. If they’re going to die anyway, why kill them? They don’t say. Then there’s the weird sub-plot about the religion that resolves in a weak way. I also found that it didn’t have a strong story structure and floundered a lot in the second act. I almost gave up on it several times. Plus, there’s Decker’s male gaze, always talking about Rachel’s body in a way that made me feel like he was a creeper (shudder). I actually enjoyed the movie more. Rachel felt more real. Decker wasn’t obsessed with animals, but instead was obsessed with his job, plus the addition of Edward James Olmos’s character made an okay story great. And Ridley Scott created a stronger story structure.