Review: Broken by A.E. Rought

Title: Broken
Author: A.E. Rought
Series: None
Rating: 2/5 Stars

384 pages
Published January 8th 2013 by Strange Chemistry
ARC received through Netgalley

Goodreads | Author | Publisher | Amazon Paperback & Kindle| Book Depository

I’d like to preface this review by saying that most of my criticism stems from the fact that this novel isn’t what it was marketed to be, and isn’t what I was expecting at all. I did quite some research before reading Broken, checking out reviews of fellow bloggers, thinking this book was for me. It most definitely wasn’t. In this review I will try to warn others to stay away from this book, if you are anything like me. For the romance lovers, especially in the tradition of Twilight, Fallen and Hush, Hush, I think you guys will eat this up. More on that later.

I’d also like to state that I read the ARC copy provided by Netgalley. So take the quotes with a grain of salt – they might not even be in the published version.

Let me sum up some facts about Broken:
- calling it a Frankenstein retelling is REALLY stretching it; there is barely a connection to the Mary Shelley’s story until about sixty percent in
- nothing substantial happens (as in anything besides romantic plot development – there is a lot of that going on) until 82 percent in
- that’s right, no action or horror until the last fifth of the book
- the main character falls in love in only three months after the death of her boyfriend

Basically, Broken is the story of Emma, who loses her boyfriend Daniel. Three months after his death she meets mysterious Alex, who she is instantly attracted to. But there is something wrong about him, and she is slightly hesitant to find out what.

The main problem I had with this book is the blurb. By just reading the blurb we can deduce that Alex is somehow Daniel: “He is strangely… familiar. From the way he knows how to open her locker when it sticks, to the nickname she shared only with Daniel, even his hazel eyes with brown flecks are just like Daniel’s”. In the book it takes her more than half the book to actually see similarities between Alex and Daniel. And this is something we already know before we even start reading. It just all took way too long for me, stretching the first half into a boring mass of angst and lovey dovey-ness.

I was waiting for the creepiness to kick in. I waited and waited. The cover is very misleading – it remembered me a bit of The Replacement, which actually was a very haunting read. Broken pretty much only features a high school and Emma’s home, both of which are extremely ordinary and nothing like gothic novel material. I’d love to at least have maybe a bit of spooky setting – sitting in a cemetery drinking isn’t my idea of a spooky setting.

Then there is the standard YA-cliche; the message that Broken sends. I have talked about this before, but I will bring it up again. Teenagers are easily manipulated. I’m not saying they are stupid and believe everything they read or see – but this is the period in life where you form your own image of the world, and of what is normal and what is not. If in a high-school novel you present it as normal that girls bully each other, then real teenage girls won’t think bullying is all that bad. It’s normal, right? My main problem with Broken was (for once) not necessarily the romance between Emma and Alex. It was rather stifling, but that’s really just a personal preference. My problem is that every girl in this novel, except Emma and maybe her best friend, is labelled a slut.

Yes, a slut. Let me quote a bit for you here. “Girls up and down the line turn to him, cleavages and boobs lifting and tracking, like indicators on radar”. What the…? This is one of the most degrading sentences I have ever read.

Literally every girl in Emma’s school wants Alex and is jealous of her. Every guy wants to be Alex. They are constantly the conversation of the school. There are literally pages and pages describing how everyone is talking about them. Here are a few examples:

“The halls teem, people pushing, jostling and shouting. Then life grinds to a halt, all eyes on us as we walk into the main hall, hand-in-hand.” I’ve never seen people grinding to halt because someone was holding hands. This isn’t major drama material, no one is cheating or anything. Oh my god, two single people in the school are holding hands! WHAT SORCERY IS THIS?!

“He nods at guys too busy starting to nod back, and ignores the petulant lip-puffing pouts from the girls”. Mind the wording – these aren’t just some girls, these are the girls. Every girl. Every single girl is a dumb lip-puffing pouting brainless person. This just makes me very, very angry. It doesn’t make these girls look bad, it makes all girls look bad. And to be honest, most of us don’t frigging care who you’re snogging anyway.

I really wonder why this book is so, SO degrading towards girls. The only person who doesn’t fall victim to this is main character Emma. Emma only ever wears hoodies, preferably her boyfriend’s, sometimes even multiple hoodies on top of each other (don’t ask me how that should work). The lesson we can gather from this is that every girl that thinks hoodies and thermal wear is boring, is a slut. At one point Emma thinks about how she missed out on the “style” gene but only got the “practical” one. So… those two are mutually exclusive? There is absolutely no way to not look like you are wearing your brother’s leftovers and be dressed practically? Behold all stylish females, we are clearly not dressed for walking around at schools! Because you know, you will look like a slut if even a hint of your cleavage is showing.

I think I get what the author is trying to say. You don’t need to have the ladies hanging out of the front of your shirt to look beautiful. There is nothing wrong with having your own style. Some girls are just plain mean and jealous and petty. That message is getting completely scrambled in the process though, turning it from quite nice to a monstrosity. Maybe that’s the real Frankenstein of this book.

Then there is also a scene in which Emma finds herself in a burning room. Once the paramedics arrive, she refuses treatment. This is so wrong. If you have been in a burning house and you have breathed in the fumes, you must get yourself checked out as soon as possible. She could have easily dropped dead after a few hours because the soot in her throat caused a reaction. I do not condone any of this kind of reckless behaviour in books. What if some teenager reads this, finds herself in a burning house, gets out, refuses treatment because who needs stuff like that, and dies? Really, the blame is on you.

By the way, the argument “what are the odds?” doesn’t work. There shouldn’t be any odds of this happening. This situation could have been mended within the story with just a few sentences. A simple “the paramedics checked all of my vitals but I was fine” would have sufficed.

Broken was not the book I was expecting to read, and if I had known what I’d be getting myself into I wouldn’t have picked it up. It completely pales in comparison, but the last fifty pages or so were quite entertaining. There is some mystery and a crazy scientist, and who doesn’t like one of those. It was all way too black and white for my taste, but that does fit the overall tone of the book. Really, if you are looking for a simple romance story with a dash of supernatural, you might love Broken. It has all the elements a YA romance reader will eat up, as long as you don’t mind the awful generalisations the novel makes.

Blurb

Imagine a modern spin on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein where a young couple’s undying love and the grief of a father pushed beyond sanity could spell the destruction of them all.

A string of suspicious deaths near a small Michigan town ends with a fall that claims the life of Emma Gentry’s boyfriend, Daniel. Emma is broken, a hollow shell mechanically moving through her days. She and Daniel had been made for each other, complete only when they were together. Now she restlessly wanders the town in the late Fall gloom, haunting the cemetery and its white-marbled tombs, feeling Daniel everywhere, his spectre in the moonlight and the fog.

When she encounters newcomer Alex Franks, only son of a renowned widowed surgeon, she’s intrigued despite herself. He’s an enigma, melting into shadows, preferring to keep to himself. But he is as drawn to her as she is to him. He is strangely… familiar. From the way he knows how to open her locker when it sticks, to the nickname she shared only with Daniel, even his hazel eyes with brown flecks are just like Daniel’s.

The closer they become, though, the more something inside her screams there’s something very wrong with Alex Franks. And when Emma stumbles across a grotesque and terrifying menagerie of mangled but living animals within the walls of the Franks’ estate, creatures she surely knows must have died from their injuries, she knows.

Other reviews you might be interested in
  • http://thedailyprophecy.blogspot.com/ Mel @thedailyprophecy

    Hahahaha, Celine, your review is spot on! You said everything I hated about this book. From the whole all-girls-are-sluts to the boring storyline. I really had troubles with sentences, like the one you picked, and I felt like I knew the complete story after reading the blurb. Such a shame, because it looked so promising! Another pretty cover did his job to conceal a horrible story :p

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      Hehe, yeah, another time that a beautiful cover fooled us! Glad we’re on the same page about this story, Mel ^^ Thanks a lot for stopping by!

  • http://twitter.com/Ashley_E_Prince Ashley Prince

    Wow! From the cover and the blurb, I was hoping this would be a good one. I don’t think I will be giving this one a read. 

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      The cover & blurb are SO misleading. I’m glad people are reading my review so they don’t make the same mistake as I did (:

  • Christajls

    I’ve heard from a few people this wasn’t what they were expecting and I’ve seen a lot of Twilight comparisons. Since I didn’t really care for the relationship in Twilight I probably won’t pick this one up

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      The relationship isn’t as controlling or freakish like in Twilight – Emma and Alex are a lot more on the same level, so to speak. It is a rather romance heavy high-schoolish drama, which is something you have to like in order to enjoy the book

  • http://twitter.com/Book_lover1988 Andrea Modolo

    I wasn’t a fan of this book either, I think I would have liked it more if the blurb didn’t give away the entire plot line of the story. I also felt that Rought had a lot of description, this is what Emma wore today, this is what she said to her friend. I wanted more to happen in the book. The cover was definitely misleading on this one

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      I didn’t mention it that much in this review, but there definitely was some over-description. Especially on Emma’s clothes; why would you constantly talk about what she’s wearing if she wears the same thing every single day? And yeah, I wish the plot was more of a surprise

  • http://twitter.com/katiesmallgirl Katie Barnett

    Great review Celine! I hate to see the good-girls-versus-slutty-girls trope, particularly in YA, where I think it can send out such a bad message to female readers. Also, when I read that quote about “cleavages and boobs, lifting and tracking”… what the hell is that?! I was unaware I could use my cleavage to track men. Anyway, I really enjoyed reading this, and I hope your next read is a lot better! :)

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      Thanks, Katie! I know right?! I wish my cleavage could do stuff like that, mine is pretty boring and doesn’t track anything.

  • http://theprettygoodgatsby.wordpress.com/ Leah @ The Pretty Good Gatsby

    Sadly, this is exactly how I felt as well. I had hoped for SO much more. If I wanted to read about teens falling in love I could have picked up any of the thousands of other YA novels. Instead, I was looking forward to a new imagining of Frankenstein and was horribly letdown.

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      Exactly. I was really hoping for some awesome monster goodness, or even a novel that captures Shelley’s critics on science and the limitations we should set ourselves. Too bad it was a high school YA romance drama, which is fine, but nothing I was hoping to read.

  • Lexxie Lin

    Excellent review Celine! I haven’t read the book, but I think the way you wrote about it, and how you explained why you feel the way you do about the story and the plot is very well done. I hate the slut-shaming – why are girls sluts and boys casanovas? Still today? I just don’t get it. As long as people are careful and use protection, it’s nobody’s business who sleeps with who in my opinion. 

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      Thanks so much Lexxie! Ugh, I absolutely hate slut-shaming too! And to be honest in this book it isn’t even as if the girls are sleeping around – they just wear tops that show a bit of cleavage. Unless you’re wearing underwear as day wear I wouldn’t think of calling anyone a slut..

  • Armando Read

    The cover is very interesting but the story that don’t convince me. I don’t know exactly why but I haven’t read the book and for now I don’t thing so.

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      Thanks for stopping by Armando

  • Hollow May

    Great review. I was curious about this one, I mean the cover is pwetty. But I had been debating if I should add to my tbr pile. Your review helped me make a decision. Thank you =)

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      I’m glad my review was of use! Thanks for the kind words, Hollow May (:

  • annethought

    Well-said. I’m not hugely into romance but the Frankenstine blurb made me interested. I’ve read a number of reviews that said it is misleading and yours is the most comprehensive. I don’t think any boy or any girl is capable of stopping the whole school from moving with just their presence. I don’t like books that make people like gods or goddesses in other people’s eyes just because of their looks or their boyfriends. Geez.

    • http://www.nyxbookreviews.com/ Celine

      Thanks Anne! Yes, I thought it was insanely egocentric and unrealistic how Emma was portrayed. I understand this is fiction, but for me it just went over the line of things you can get away with as a writer.

  • http://twitter.com/slpemdb Sarah Lee

    Though the cover is striking and is what made me click on the review, It doesn’t sound like something I’d really enjoy. Thank you for your honest review! :)